CO₂e Attestation — Compliance

Compliance & Legal Limits Overview

Full legal, regulatory and compliance framework governing the CO₂e Attestation, including legal boundaries, CSRD / ESRS positioning, GDPR conformity, liability allocation, permitted and prohibited uses, data governance and institutional constraints.

2.Regulatory Alignment & Non-Equivalence Statement

This section clarifies how Certif-Scope aligns with recognized international environmental accounting frameworks while explicitly stating that the output does not constitute a substitute for mandatory regulatory reporting. Regulatory alignment ensures methodological consistency without implying legal compliance equivalence.

Standards Used as Reference (Non-Substitutive)

Certif-Scope relies on established methodological references for structure and consistency. These frameworks inform the spend-based calculation logic but are not fully implemented, replaced, or reproduced.

  • • GHG Protocol — Scope 3 spend-based methodology.
  • • ISO 14064-1 principles of relevance, consistency and transparency.
  • • ISO 14083 transport emission boundary logic (non-mandatory integration).
  • • EEIO macroeconomic emission factor modelling as foundational reference.
  • • ADEME / DEFRA published emission intensities as accessible baselines.

Non-Equivalence With Mandatory Regulatory Frameworks

The indicative output produced by Certif-Scope must not be confused with or used as a replacement for any mandatory reporting deliverables. The system does not generate compliant disclosures under:

  • • CSRD European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS).
  • • EU Taxonomy eligibility/alignments assessments.
  • • GHG Protocol full corporate inventory (primary data required).
  • • National emission reporting schemes or carbon taxes.
  • • ISO 14064 third-party verified greenhouse gas statements.

The Certif-Scope output is an indicative, non-binding estimate based on financial expenditure. It cannot be used in regulatory filings without independent review and methodological adaptation by accredited professionals.

Purpose of Regulatory Alignment

Alignment supports institutional confidence by ensuring that the methodology follows internationally recognized principles without misrepresenting itself as a full regulatory reporting solution.

  • • Ensures methodological transparency.
  • • Promotes compatibility with screening and risk-assessment workflows.
  • • Facilitates institutional audits through fixed versioning and deterministic results.
  • • Avoids regulatory ambiguity by clearly distinguishing non-binding indicators.

Legal Interpretation Restrictions

Certif-Scope outputs must not be interpreted as audited environmental disclosures, validated greenhouse gas inventories, or financial-regulatory evidence. All legal responsibility for regulatory usage belongs to the institution using the tool.

  • • No regulatory assurance is provided.
  • • No claim of equivalence to CSRD or ESRS reporting structures.
  • • No suitability for compliance submissions without expert validation.
  • • No inference of operational emissions or supplier accuracy.

4.Regulatory Non-Equivalence & Misuse Prevention

This section formally establishes that Certif-Scope outputs cannot, under any circumstance, be considered equivalent to regulatory disclosures, mandatory environmental reports or certified calculations. It also defines the restrictions preventing incorrect or misleading usage by institutions, suppliers or auditors.

Non-Equivalence With Regulatory Frameworks

Certif-Scope provides indicative estimates only. They must not be used as legally required documentation under any of the following frameworks:

  • • CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive)
  • • ESRS (European Sustainability Reporting Standards)
  • • EU Taxonomy mandatory disclosures
  • • ISO 14064-1 certified inventories
  • • ISO 14083 logistics accounting
  • • Supplier-specific carbon declarations

Misuse Prevention Rules

To prevent incorrect interpretation or misleading communication, the following restrictions apply unconditionally:

  • • Outputs cannot be labelled as “audited” or “certified”.
  • • Results cannot be expressed as Scope 1 or Scope 2 emissions.
  • • No equivalence can be claimed with regulatory filings.
  • • No use in green claims or marketing claims.
  • • No merging with supplier-specific primary data.

Responsibility Clarification

Certif-Scope does not validate, audit or correct user-provided financial data. Responsibility for input accuracy remains fully with the user or institution.

  • • No liability for inaccurate, incomplete or misleading inputs.
  • • No responsibility for third-party interpretations.
  • • No obligation to align with future regulatory updates.

5.Data Boundaries & Prohibited Interpretations

This section clarifies what the Certif-Scope output represents, and more importantly, what it does not represent. These boundaries prevent incorrect interpretation of indicative CO₂e values and ensure that institutions handle the results within appropriate legal and methodological limits.

What the Data Represents

  • • Indicative CO₂e values derived exclusively from financial expenditure.
  • • Category-level estimates based on economic carbon intensity averages.
  • • Spend-based modelling aligned with GHG Protocol guidance.
  • • A reproducible, version-controlled calculation snapshot.
  • • A non-binding indicator supporting high-level institutional screening.

What the Data Does NOT Represent

The output must not be treated as a precise measurement, verification or physical emission report. It specifically does not represent:

  • • Actual operational emissions of a company.
  • • Supplier-specific primary emissions data.
  • • Activity-based or metered measurements (kWh, km, fuel, heat, etc.).
  • • Lifecycle or cradle-to-gate assessments.
  • • Official data accepted by CSRD/ESRS or ISO-certified audits.
  • • Evidence for regulatory filings or environmental claims.

Prohibited Interpretations

To maintain legal integrity and avoid institutional risk, the following interpretations are explicitly prohibited:

  • • Treating the value as certified, audited, or validated emissions.
  • • Using the indicative value as proof of supplier compliance.
  • • Inferring environmental performance or efficiency trends.
  • • Assuming equivalence with mandatory regulatory disclosures.
  • • Using the number to justify marketing or ESG claims.
  • • Interpreting the estimate as a Scope 1 or Scope 2 measurement.

Why These Boundaries Are Mandatory

Spend-based models use economic averages and cannot capture physical emissions with accuracy. Regulatory frameworks require measurable, verifiable, activity-based data. Without strict boundaries, the risk of institutional misinterpretation would compromise compliance and expose organisations to enforcement actions.

Anti-Misrepresentation Warning

Any attempt to present Certif-Scope’s indicative values as verified emissions, regulatory-compliant disclosures, or certified environmental performance constitutes a misrepresentation. Institutions remain legally responsible for any incorrect interpretation or communication of results.

7.Prohibited Claims & Misuse Prevention

This section establishes strict prohibitions to prevent misinterpretation, regulatory misalignment or unlawful communication of results. Certif-Scope values are indicative only and cannot be used for advertising, compliance filings, public ESG declarations or comparative performance benchmarking.

Forbidden Use in External Communications

Under EU consumer law and environmental marketing regulations, the values generated by Certif-Scope must not be presented in any context implying verified or certified emissions performance:

  • • No ESG marketing claims or promotional statements.
  • • No “carbon neutral”, “low carbon”, or similar claims.
  • • No public comparison against competitors or industry averages.
  • • No use in product environmental labeling or eco-design compliance.
  • • No publication as audited or regulator-approved data.

Prohibited Regulatory Misuse

Certif-Scope output must not be submitted, referenced or implied in any legal, contractual or regulatory document requiring validated emissions accounting:

  • • Not acceptable for CSRD or ESRS filings.
  • • Not acceptable for ISO 14064-1 verification.
  • • Not acceptable for EU Taxonomy classification.
  • • Not acceptable for EU Green Claims Directive compliance.
  • • Not acceptable for national regulatory emissions registries.

Legal Risk Prevention

Institutions must ensure that indicative values are not reinterpreted as factual emissions. Misrepresentation can trigger legal liabilities under:

  • • EU Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (for misleading claims).
  • • National consumer protection and advertising laws.
  • • Banking and procurement due diligence misreporting risks.
  • • Contractual liability for inaccurate ESG disclosures.

Why These Prohibitions Are Required

Without explicit restrictions, indicative values could be misrepresented as regulatory-grade data, exposing institutions to compliance breaches, sanctions or reputational risk. These prohibitions ensure legal clarity, protect users, and preserve the methodological integrity of spend-based estimations.

9.Auditability & Independent Verification Boundaries

This section establishes the exact conditions under which Certif-Scope outputs may be independently verified by third parties. It defines verification scope, boundaries, reproducibility requirements, and limitations. It ensures accuracy of interpretation while preventing improper use as regulatory audit evidence.

Scope of Independent Verification

Third-party reviewers may verify the internal consistency of an attestation using only the embedded metadata and the emission factor version referenced in the output. This verification is limited to structural and mathematical reproducibility:

  • • Correct application of category-specific emission factors.
  • • Correct multiplication of spending by emission factors.
  • • Correct aggregation of category-level results into totals.
  • • Correct dataset version alignment with embedded metadata.

Boundaries of Verification

Verification is strictly limited to mathematical consistency. Reviewers cannot:

  • • Validate the accuracy of user-submitted financial inputs.
  • • Confirm whether spending amounts are exhaustive or correct.
  • • Assess supplier-specific carbon intensity or real emissions.
  • • Use the attestations as a proxy for CSRD/ESRS reporting.

Requirements for Successful Reproduction

For an attestation to be reproducible independently, the following conditions must be met without exception:

  • • Input values must be identical to those submitted originally.
  • • Category mapping must follow the published definitions.
  • • The same emission factor dataset version must be used.
  • • No post-processing, scaling or reinterpretation is allowed.

Explicit Verification Limits

Verification cannot extend beyond the deterministic scope of the model. Certif-Scope does not store financial inputs, therefore independent reviewers cannot re-access or revalidate user data. No metadata exists beyond what is embedded in the final attestation file.

Forbidden Interpretations of the Verification Process

  • • Treating indicative values as audited or certified emissions.
  • • Using the attestation as regulatory reporting evidence.
  • • Assuming data quality validation of user inputs.
  • • Comparing outputs across years as if operationally consistent.
  • • Using results as a substitute for primary LCA or Scope 1/2/3 reporting.